Re: Property and life

From: Samael (Samael@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Tue Jan 12 1999 - 09:53:41 MST


-----Original Message-----
From: Dick.Gray@bull.com <Dick.Gray@bull.com>
To: extropians@extropy.com <extropians@extropy.com>
Date: 12 January 1999 16:45
Subject: Re: Property and life

>
>
>Samael writes:
>>I don't have a right to live. I have a very strong 'wish' to live.
>
>What if I have a very strong wish to terminate your life? Is my wish not as
>valid as yours? Can I rightfully implement my wish? If not, why not?

I have repeatedly stated that I don't believe in objective morals. So in
the above statement 'valid' and rightfully' do not make syntactic sense.
There is no 'right', 'wrong', 'valid', 'invalid', 'good', 'evil' except
within moral systems.

>>I've dimissed morality as a creation with no validity
>
>So have I, it may surprise you to know. I don't speak of morality, but of
>ethics.

Okay. Please define ethics in some sort of objective way. Show me the
logical, non-emotional basis for ethics.

>

>>and based my actions around aesthetics - ie what I liek and dislike.
>
>Rather short-sighted, if you ask me. There are lots of things I don't like
>that I nevertheless realize are good for me. Flu shots, for instance.

So, I like Flu shots. Becasuwe I recognise their long term value. Liking
something is not necessarily an instaneous thing. You can like the outcome
of something.

>
>I think prudence makes a much firmer grounding for ethical principles than
>does mere pleasure seeking/pain avoidance.
>
>>And I like living. And I like having access to things.
>
>Why should anyone else care what you like? Why are you entitled to
>something just because you like it?
>

i'm not _entitled_ to anything. I have no rights, except as a social
construct agreed between two or more people. Rights are an _invention_.
You can't point to one, or hold one up or stick a needle into it. It's a
theoretical creation of the human minds.

I keep pointing out that I don't believe these things exist and then you ask
me where they are.

I feel like I'm stuck with a bad copy of Eliza:

Me: I don't believe in morals

You: That's a rather immoral thing to say.

Ack!

Sorry, if I'm causing offence, but I'm still waiting for one example for a
purely logical basis for morals or ethics that does not depend on what you,
I or anyone else thinks or feels.

Samael



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:47 MST