From: Terry Donaghe (tdonaghe@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Jan 10 1999 - 06:30:40 MST
---Samael <samael@dial.pipex.com> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael S. Lorrey <retroman@together.net>
> >Sorry, deconstructivism outside of lingusitics is merely an excuse to
> dismiss
> >personal integrity. Come back with a real argument.
>
>
> Please excplain what you mean by this?
>
> Do you honestly believe in objective, universal standards of right
and
> wrong? If so, please state where objective unioversal standards of
eright
> and wrong come from and what makes them so. You may well
revolutionise a
> large chunk of philosophy (I doubt it, but I'd love to be proved
wrong).
>
> Samael
>
>
Samael, please explain how you can, in good faith, follow a philosophy
which can be construed to justify anything. Your subjectivist
philosophy implies that it may, under certain circumstances, be
morally okey dokey to nuke a newborn in a microwave. Hey, there's no
wrong or right! We can do anything!
I'm not a philosopher and I have no grand justification of objectivism
other than the fact that your subjectivism can justify all of what
most of us consider evil in the world - genocide, murder, rape, child
abuse, etc etc.
==
Terry Donaghe: terry@donaghe.com
My Homepage: <http://www.donaghe.com/terry.htm> - Recently Updated!!
Also: <http://www.donaghe.com> - See the REAL dancing baby
Visit The Millennium Bookshelf: <http://www.donaghe.com/mbookshelf.htm> Prepare yourself for the next age of mankind!
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 15:02:46 MST