From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Mon Dec 28 1998 - 01:31:13 MST
> John K Clark:
>
>The trouble with Quantum mechanics isn't that it has no interpretation it's
>that it has too many and they all work. Everett's many world
interpretation is
>consistent with all experimental results performed up to now, the same is
true
>of John Cramer's Transactional Interpretation, or David Bohm's Pilot Wave
>Interpretation or Niels Boor's Copenhagen Interpretation. Which one is right?
>All of them? None of them?
>
IMHO, every "interpretation" of QM is an attempt to take our ordinary human
perception and project this into QM. If you look at QM as a way to predict
measurements, it works out beautifully, just as John's note re Feynman
states. "Many Worlds", "Observers", "Collapse of the Wave Function" are all
just gibberish. Entertaining, though.
O--------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
| |
| Man, Debug Thyself |
| - Graffiti at People's |
| Computer Company - 1976 |
O--------------------------------O
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:50:06 MST