From: Joe E. Dees (jdees0@students.uwf.edu)
Date: Fri Dec 18 1998 - 13:54:10 MST
From: Dick.Gray@bull.com
To: extropians@extropy.com
Date sent: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 12:49:18 -0700
Subject: Re: The Education Function
Send reply to: extropians@extropy.com
>
>
> Joe won't give up:
> >I dispute the validity of your self-serving definitions.
>
> They're not my definitions. They're the ones in general use by legal
> scholars and political philosophers.
>
> >Welfare is an unearned gift from a government to a corporation or
> individual;
> >under this definition (the proper one), my examples fully apply.
>
> Now it's the word "gift" that you're distorting. Allowing someone to keep a
> little more of his own property is not a "gift" in my book. But that's just
> my self-serving definition, I guess.
>
> Dick
>
Since when do corporations hold a priori title to to mineral rights or
lumber on public land? To grant these to corporations at well below
market value because one has greased some politician's palm is
graft-inspired welfare and, in fact, theft in my book (and probably in
George Boole's Irving Copi's and Willare Van Orman Quine's books,
as well). Joe
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:50:03 MST