From: Samael (Samael@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Tue Dec 15 1998 - 06:30:54 MST
-----Original Message-----
From: mark@unicorn.com <mark@unicorn.com>
To: extropians@extropy.com <extropians@extropy.com>
Date: 15 December 1998 13:28
Subject: Re: Surveillance Technology
>Peter C. McCluskey [pcm@rahul.net] wrote:
>>This appears to allow the resistance to survive in a continually
>>decreasing area of low surveillance, but there's no obvious way for
>>the resistance to increase it's territory.
>
>You're assuming the resistance will be passive. If the surveillance freaks
>back us into a corner we'll just nuke 'em.
I thought the government was the one with the nukes?
Samael
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:50:01 MST