From: mark@unicorn.com
Date: Tue Dec 15 1998 - 05:33:11 MST
Peter C. McCluskey [pcm@rahul.net] wrote:
>This appears to allow the resistance to survive in a continually
>decreasing area of low surveillance, but there's no obvious way for
>the resistance to increase it's territory.
You're assuming the resistance will be passive. If the surveillance freaks
back us into a corner we'll just nuke 'em.
Mark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:50:01 MST