From: Spike Jones (spike66@ibm.net)
Date: Mon Dec 14 1998 - 23:19:08 MST
> Spike Jones [spike66@ibm.net] wrote:
>
> >yes. this is a major shortcoming of gps guided exoatmospheric
> >devices. at typical reentry velocities you have only a very few
> >(typically 3) seconds to reacquire gps and react.
> mark@unicorn.com wrote:
> Why would this be a problem? At least for the shuttle and other shallow
> reentry vehicles the shielding only occurs below it; the shuttle is now
> in continuous contact with the ground via the TDRS sattelites using the
> upper antennae. I guess that a much steeper re-entry might block out
> signals from above as well.
yes it does.
> Of course the fundamental flaw of all GPS-guided weaponry is GPS-faking
> or GPS-jamming. Relying on external signals to tell you your position is
> always risky.
right but as it turns out, the problem is daunting even with a fully
cooperative
target. {8^D against a target that is technologically advanced and does
not want to be hit, forget it. this might be exactly why the gps guided
reentry bodies are not classified: they are not really practical. spike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:50:00 MST