From: den Otter (neosapient@geocities.com)
Date: Mon Dec 14 1998 - 16:19:53 MST
----------
> From: Dick.Gray@bull.com
> den Otter writes:
>
> "If you cut off your private army's funds they'll do exactly what every
> other pissed-off private army did before them: they'll come and take
> it by force (perhaps shooting you, torching your home and raping
> your wife, kids and dog if they feel like it). An army that's intended
> to take on PPAs and even nation states shouldn't have much of a
> problem with coercing a couple of civilians."
>
> You're forgetting that this private army (aka militia) would be *us*, or
> our sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers.
The problem is that many people can't/won't be professional soldiers,
and in a world full of (potential) enemies you really need more than
just a bunch of guys with AKs; you need trained personnel that can
fly helicopters, fire missiles, operate tanks, knows about demolition,
surveillance techniques, counter-intelligence etc, etc. This means that
you have to form a standing army with (probably) mercenaries, as
was often done troughout history. People's militias can be a good
addition to a professional army, but are not sufficient to defend your
territory against a serious attack in this day and age.
There is one alternative tactic, of course: stockpile weapons of
mass destruction and threaten to use them against anyone who
attacks. This *does* severely limit your tactical possibilities, of
course...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:50:00 MST