From: CurtAdams@aol.com
Date: Thu Dec 10 1998 - 09:19:26 MST
In a message dated 12/10/98 5:03:11 AM, asa@nada.kth.se wrote:
>(there
>is no reason for it to have just a single cause, it could turn out
>that increasing lifespan might have to jump through one hurdle after
>another - first decrease the risk of infectious disease, then
>cardiovascular disease, then fix metabolic aging, then the telomeres,
>then fix the increased cancer risk, then fix long-term neural and
>psychological changes, ... ad infinitum)
Assuming that aging is the result of many independent causes facing selection
is, so far, the only one that generates the Gompertz curve.
Single-cause aging predicts different survival curves, which don't
match those of real biological populations. They do often match
those of devices and of patients with terminal illnesses.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:56 MST