From: Emmanuel Charpentier (manu@cybercable.fr)
Date: Mon Nov 23 1998 - 16:08:41 MST
> > >> If I have two printers printing out the same novel and I smash one is the book
> > >> destroyed ?
> >
> > >Well, the one you stopped certainly is.
> >
> > I don't care because nothing irreplaceable has been destroyed.
>
> Well, no, but is that what really matters? Is a promise to
> record the positions of every atom in your brain sufficient
> to make your death palatable? I would say not, even though
> nothing irreplaceable has been destroyed. The point seems
> to be not whether you can be replaced, but whether this
> iteration of you ends.
Trying to think about this problem from an evolution point of view ->
One given set of genes or memes really does care if a perfect copy of it
is being destroyed or not.
After all, we are all examples of such bodies of genes or memes that
have managed to copy (read reproduce, if only partly) themselves...
Now here is a funny problem, why wouldn't a particular set try very
hard to use cloning or uploading to make huge copies of itself. Once it
starts, it can use its power as a group to do anything it wants, that is
copy itself. What is to stop it? Other reproducing sets??? :-)
Turning now to singletons advocates (elli?), how do you make sure it
just doesn't end up in that kind of direction? Eating up all universe
information into what we would today consider a dead end, if not a
threat...? Particularly if you think we can not imagine what is after
transcendence?
Manu.
(madison's road was on tv tonight. I feel in a great mood, too bad I got
to go to sleep and work tomorrow. Just wanted to share)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:50 MST