Re: Rationale: No New OS.

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Sat Nov 21 1998 - 16:32:30 MST

Next message: Jfkme@aol.com: "Re: Readers needed to vet a new novel."
Previous message: Erin Jones: "Re: Transhumanist Kids [was: Re: FW: Immortality ...]"
In reply to: Eugene Leitl: "Rationale: No New OS."
Next in thread: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Rationale: No New OS."
Reply: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Rationale: No New OS."
Reply: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Rationale: No New OS."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

If you need an OS to do something, rewrite Linux.
And hasn't Beowolf done distributed supercomputing already?

There are only two real OSes. MacOS is the supreme OS for users, and Linux is
the supreme OS for programmers. Everything else is the 90% of everything that
is crap.

-- 
        sentience@pobox.com         Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
         http://pobox.com/~sentience/AI_design.temp.html
          http://pobox.com/~sentience/sing_analysis.html
Disclaimer:  Unless otherwise specified, I'm not telling you
everything I think I know.

Next message: Jfkme@aol.com: "Re: Readers needed to vet a new novel."
Previous message: Erin Jones: "Re: Transhumanist Kids [was: Re: FW: Immortality ...]"
In reply to: Eugene Leitl: "Rationale: No New OS."
Next in thread: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Rationale: No New OS."
Reply: Eugene Leitl: "Re: Rationale: No New OS."
Reply: Dan Clemmensen: "Re: Rationale: No New OS."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:49 MST