Re: Amusing anti-cloning arguments

From: Patrick Mullaghy (pmulaghy@indigo.ie)
Date: Tue Oct 27 1998 - 01:25:53 MST


-----Original Message-----
From: Spike Jones <spike66@ibm.net>
To: extropians@extropy.com <extropians@extropy.com>
Date: 27 October 1998 03:11
Subject: Re: Amusing anti-cloning arguments

>> Hara Ra writes:
>> > Next to, and underlying the philosophere is the much deeper and darker
>> > stupidosphere....

Couldn't think of an argument, huh?
>>
>> Noosphere and ignosphere? Hmm... that's a useful concept.

Concept(s)?
>
>not the noosphere gene, the noknowsphere... spike {8^D
>

'no know' is appropriate, or 'no no', transhumanists shouldn't have no no's,
no?

Fact is, the existence of telepathy (*if* it exists, and it was accepted by
Jung and Freud and William James and Sony etc etc) is an anomaly for the
physicalist world view. It may prove to be compatible with it, but it hasn't
been explained in physicalist terms yet.

But relax. No need to lose the faith. No one's suggesting that a minor
anomaly is any reason to abandon the transhumanist quest, just that loading
up will be leaving a slight puzzle behind.

The puzzle might be irrelevant, or it might be indicative of something more
significant.

As for 'noosphere,' nomenclature is not important, as people who revel in
the endless neologisms of science fiction should appreciate.

PM.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:42 MST