From: Patrick Mullaghy (pmulaghy@indigo.ie)
Date: Thu Oct 22 1998 - 11:26:30 MDT
To
-Why
>>shouldn't the unconscious mind be just as much of an experiencing
instrument
>>as the conscious mind is acknowledged to be? In some ways this is the more
>>parsimonious assumption. Put the 'P' back in ESP?
Hara Ra wrote
>I have no problem with the unconscious being an active participant. 'P' is
>just fine. The problem I have is with the 'E'....
I share the spirit of your scepticism, but widespread experience does seem
to indicate that telepathy occurs now and again, often between people
thousands of miles apart, which would seem to make it ES.
After uploading, however, the question of whether 'thought transference', as
it used to be known, is possible between biological brains will surely
become moot.
The only nag is whether such apparent ESP's, patchy as they are, indicate
some 'dimension,' some nooshpere, which would be ontologically enriching if
only we could find the key to exploring/mapping it.
If we vacate the receiving brain, we may never know.
Patrick M.
>
>O--------------------------------O
>| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
>| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
>| |
>| Man, Debug Thyself |
>| - Graffiti at People's |
>| Computer Company - 1976 |
>O--------------------------------O
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:40 MST