A Biological Singularity

From: John Clark (jonkc@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Mon Sep 21 1998 - 14:27:06 MDT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CurtAdams@aol.com Wrote:

>A code allows you to decode something.

Yes and even more important in this case, a high level code would give you an
easy way to encode a complex physical trait into DNA.

>Knowing the eye-signal gene allows you to spot other eye-signals
>but gives you no idea what any other gene does.

I said there was good evidence a high level language must exist, I don't know
how to reach any other conclusion when we find a simple command can cause
thousands of mouse genes to cooperate and produce a very complex structure
like a mouse eye and exactly the same command can make thousands of fly genes
produce a vastly different fly eye. I also made very clear that we don't
understand that high level language yet, we only know two or three of the
words and none of the grammar. My point was that interesting things could
result when we know more and we may learn more in a hurry.

>With the genetic code, by contrast, I can give you the amino acid
>sequence of any gene

Genes do not contain amino acids, proteins do. Genes are made of DNA
(RNA in a few viruses like AIDS) and information is conveyed in a
very long sequence of only 4 bases in that DNA. The genetic code is just
the mapping of the 64 possible base triplets (4 X 4 X 4) to the
20 amino acids life uses in proteins.

>Your eye-signal gene can't differentiate you from a chimp because it's
>not different in any functional sense.

Exactly my point. Call it a signal, call it a code, call it a language,
whatever you call it one thing is certain, it itself is not an eye, for it to
produce an eye a translation is needed. The amazing thing is that all life
seems to use the same translation book, and that's why I want a copy of that
book.

>A human who had all the highly conserved genes from a chimp would be
>a human to all tests, except to a sequencing machine.

As written that's pure unadulterated nonsense. My hope is that's not
really the idea you want to express and you just wrote a bad sentence.

          John K Clark jonkc@att.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.5

iQA/AwUBNga2md+WG5eri0QzEQIWxgCgjzq2pyHgEjJEv1X2S/H7NXnf7uAAoJV5
RRT7F0b2c8ZurArpCu2ecfmE
=Ln7V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:35 MST