Re: META: Re: I Love Jenny - Not!

From: James Wilson (netsurf@sersol.com)
Date: Thu Aug 20 1998 - 20:44:12 MDT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Makes sense. Until SMTP is authenticated cryptologically it is
difficult to prevent this.

- --
James D. Wilson
http://www.pixi.com/~netsurf/
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
    William of Ockham (1285-1347/49)

- -----Original Message-----
From: J. Maxwell Legg <income@ihug.co.nz>
To: extropians@extropy.com <extropians@extropy.com>
Date: Thursday, August 20, 1998 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: META: Re: I Love Jenny - Not!

>
>
>
>
>David McFadzean wrote:
>
>> At 05:53 PM 8/19/98 -1000, James Wilson wrote:
>> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >If the list admin can't keep spam from unsubscribed persons off
the
>> >list, is it possible to keep this troll off?
>>
>> Is everything posted from an unsubscribed address to be considered
spam?
>> If so, it is easy enough to block that from the list.
>
>I would doubt that very much. If the list of email addresses
subscribed to a
>list is available the spam can be made to look like it is coming
through the
>list but bypasses it altogether and simply spoofs the addresses to
look like
>it came from the list. Most will be none the wiser and in fact the
list
>owner can be made to look like a supporter of the spam. I mention
this
>because I saw it happen recently on the wholesys-list and really felt
sorry
>for the list owner who had no control over the situation.
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.5 for non-commercial use <http://www.nai.com>
Comment: All Spammers Are Thiefs - Support the Smith Bill

iQA/AwUBNdze+zAufbtGOmgdEQKUJQCgqBctZatfyuqjK3ZG4DRbLrLoZKgAoNLl
h50a9lFYxcU676f83nGXxPrr
=O/dE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:29 MST