Re: BASICS: SSTO stumbling blocks (was Re: SPACE: Roton in New Scientist)

From: Michael M. Butler (butlerj-nkmail@comp-lib.org)
Date: Fri Aug 07 1998 - 01:02:00 MDT


Correction/Addendum to my earlier rant:
At 22:37 8/6/98 -0700, I wrote:
... > Even a microscopic upward bump in thrown mass tends to have a
>negative impact on bring-down payload mass.

I should have prefaced this with "For a simple (nearly-)ballistic booster,"
and moved the whole thing to be the first sentence of the paragraph, then
changed the following text to read:

> If the bring-down mass goes negative, you're stuck with...

MMB in a correctness wienie moment, suddenly overcome with self-doubt, not
sure he hasn't misstated something glaringly obvious... :)

===================> Am I expecting a message from you? <=====================
  If you're not sure, may I suggest you change my return address when/if you
  send mail? Remove the bracketed portion of butler[j-nkmail]@comp-lib.org
===================> "Go team, beat SP*M." <=====================
"The highest love [is] uniquely human, the product of compassion and liberty--
    _not one at the expense of the other_." -- L. A. Chu & M. M. Butler
                  



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:25 MST