From: Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com)
Date: Sun Jul 19 1998 - 01:07:41 MDT
>> There's another option here. Instead of bang! make an independent copy,
>> how about making a copy which is connected with the originial with a truly
>> high bandwidth interface. So much so that it is one individual with two
>> bodies. Now, gradually reduce the bandwidth.......
>
>What would this do? Connecting two copies and then disconnecting them
>seems like it would leave them in their original unconnected state. I'm
>not sure what you're trying to accomplish by doing this. I don't see
>how this relates my statement above.
Which one is "me"? I think this whole debate is nonsense.
O--------------------------------O
| Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> |
| Box 8334 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 |
| |
| Death is for animals; |
| immortality for gods. |
| Technology is the means by |
| which we make the transition. |
O--------------------------------O
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:22 MST