Re: Cosmological revolutions

From: EvMick@aol.com
Date: Fri Jul 17 1998 - 18:28:53 MDT


In a message dated 7/16/98 1:36:15 PM Central Daylight Time,
rcs@CS.Arizona.EDU writes:

>
> I would add one more data point to "we're in for a cosmological
> revolution":

This brings up a point that I'm curious about. I'd be interested in an
evaluation of the paper at.

 http://homepages.force9.net/calresco/cosmic.htm

by any on this list who are knowledgable in this field. Also...is this SITE
credible?

Some of the things that have my attention are....

>>c) The Universe is no more than 20 Billion years old

>>Galactic clusters have been discovered that could not gravitationally have
evolved to the >>state they are in now in less than 100 Billion years,
contradicting the theory.

and

>>i) Standard Model predicts abundant magnetic monopoles - not one has been
found >>experimentally.

>>j) General relativity suggests curvatures of the universe 60 orders of
magnitude greater >>than those seen.

There are other sites which continue in the same vein.

    http://members.xoom.com/spacetheory/

Being one.

EvMick



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:22 MST