FAQ: TRANSHUMANISM AND NATURE

From: Eugene Leitl (eugene@liposome.genebee.msu.su)
Date: Fri Jul 17 1998 - 08:24:30 MDT


Nick Bostrom writes:
> I'm too tired right now to come up with any proposals for how to
> answer the following questions. Anybody got any rethorical ideas?
>
> TRANSHUMANISM AND NATURE
>
> Why do transhumanists want to live longer?

Wanting to live forever is an axiom of my current private
philosophy. For now, I am content with it being an
evolutionary artefact, opaque to ratio.
 
>
> Isn't transhumanism tampering with nature?
 
This is a meaningless question. Nature can't handle unnaturally.

> Won't transhuman technologies make us inhuman?

Yes. No. Panta rhei.

> Are transhumanist technologies environmentally sound?
 
If you define environment as current ecosystem, no.
 
> Might transhuman technologies be dangerous?

Yes, possibly terminally so.

My $0.02
'gene



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:22 MST