Re: The Singularity

From: Natasha Vita More (fka Nancie Clark) (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Wed Jul 15 1998 - 21:51:14 MDT


At 02:41 AM 7/12/98 -0700, Hara Ra wrote:

>This all assumes that SIs are separate from us. One way to avoid this is
>to form a symbiosis with them. This brings up other interesting issues,
>such as bandwidth, and whether the symbiotic system would feel that the
>human component is worth keeping around.

I'd rather not see transhumanity written up in 2055, with a headline
something like 'Mesopotamia Dried Up -- Transhumanity Too" or "Like the
Romans Patricians, Transhumanity Slept While The SIs Arrived." It wasn't
a lack of creativity that caused the fall of certain societies, but a lack
of good strategies in dealing with possible future outcomes of
technologies. (-- an ecological impact plan.)

I've had to deal with the residue of slavery in the South, and getting a
right to vote. I really can't fathom performing like a "fast minded dog"
serving coffee to a SI. I'd rather the Si's internal society (of mind)
agents (as an option for a SI profiling) at least delve into my mind agents
and function symbiotically, or at least intuitively.

"To sum it up, if we do it right, I think we have excellent chances to
leap beyond our current status quo in a few bounds. Let's." - 'gene

Natasha Vita More [fka Nancie Clark]: www.natasha.cc
Transhumanist Art Centre - Home of Extropic Art: www.extropic-art.com
**NEW** Transhuman Culture InfoMark: www.transhuman.org
PRESS RELEASE: "We are transhumans ..." Meme Orbits Saturn in 2004!

"The best defense is an aesthetic offense."
        



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:21 MST