Re: [UPLOADING] Is an exact duplicate "me"?

From: Randall R Randall (rrandall6@juno.com)
Date: Sun Jul 12 1998 - 21:17:04 MDT


    --
On Sun, 12 Jul 1998 02:30:18 -0400 harv@gate.net (Harvey Newstrom)
writes:
>Same old argument...

What did you expect? :)

>If the original were
>killed and they copy continued in its place, the result would be the
>same as if the original had continued. I think everyone agree with
>this(?).

For everyone but the dead guy, yeah.

>Is there any rationale for killing one over the other? No. They are
>identical in every way, including memories and thought processes. The
>idea that the original has more of a right to live or claim the identity
>of "me" than the copy does not make sense and cannot be proven or
>distinguished between the two individuals.

Nor am I claiming this.

>Is the "life" to be measured from the individual's point of view,
>or from the point of view of others?

This is apparently where I differ with many,
including John Clark. I would say we must
measure from the individual's point of view.

    --digsig
         Wolfkin.
     5CaaHx/ncmWI7mi94lMRbZ5naWfoiAiWyG37UUfee/P
     +C8HtTTfEkl0JGFlXUcF+AjbKogNJ4yUjFIujT5F
     46TTf+BxsBFhbGlRpRSyQJ18iPDhfvXxIhlK5eJs8

wolfkin@flatoday.infi.net | ICQ: 3043097
E-Gold Acct: 100678 @ www.e-gold.com
On a visible but distant shore a new image of man,
The shape of his own future, now in his own hands.
                                                | Johnny Clegg

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:20 MST