Re: Drooling Creationists?

From: Fireeye978@aol.com
Date: Mon Jul 06 1998 - 20:32:00 MDT


In a message dated 98-07-06 14:06:14 EDT, you write:

<< He was a creationist, but the committee decided that his religous
 beliefs didn't effect his work, which was excellent. >>

Through what method? Tea leaves? Chicken entrails? Sorry, I shouldn't be
sarcastic, but the idea that someone can "partition" their beliefs in such a
manner seems specious. Ones beliefs affect anything one does, wether or not
one is consciously aware of this. This person may strive to eleminate any
"contamination" of his work by his beliefs. He will fail. He can't help it.
They aren't something he thinks about rationally, they are his beliefs,
founded on and nurtured by his faith in them. It would be impossible for such
a person to be both sane and to compartmentalize their thinking in such a way.

It seems odd to me that a creationist is found to be able to separate his
beliefs from his work, but if an athiest applied for that same position and
publicly called himself such, he'd stand about as much chance of getting the
job as I would of flapping my arms and taking flight.

Cori



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:18 MST