From: Damien Broderick (damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Jul 06 1998 - 10:46:57 MDT
At 09:11 PM 7/5/98 -0700, JKC wrote:
> >4. Won't extended lifespans cause overpopulation problems?
>
>Probably not.
Why not? I'm struggling to deal with this topic in my book abt prolonged
longevity, and I don't know what to think. If you assume that women run
out of eggs at menopause (having been shedding follicles at a humongous
rate since around conception), it mightn't make any difference if they
lived forever thereafter using what amounts to HRT + nanobots - well, aside
from the sheer increasing mass of un-dead remaining on the surface instead
of declining gracefully under it. But if you can fiddle with cells, you
can presumably kick-start your tired stem cells if you get the urge for
another kid (and they're *just so sweet*). And even this leaves out the
possibilities of uploading by preference to bio-living, cloning in vitro
for 9 months (no pain, just gain), all that. But if rejuvenated people
felt the urge for a new family every 50 or 100 years (as mid-life crisis
men seem prone to now), this would surely have a terrific demographic
impact. Alas, I'm no good at doing this kind of thing on my fingers and
toes. Any numerate speculators out there?
Damien Broderick
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:17 MST