From: David Bradley (ibradley@nauticom.net)
Date: Tue May 05 1998 - 22:36:41 MDT
promixr@ix.netcom.com, this is nothing against you personally... You
actually reminded me of my suggestion.
> The techno explosion is all about cheap disposable, recycleable, music
> made by the microprocessor/human interface. This is the folk music of
> the future.
Wow, I always hoped that if/when people could transcend the need to worry
about short life spans and technology advanced, that more time could be
spent expanding the horizons of art and creativity.
If that is the folk music of the future, I'd prefer the folk music of the
past any day.
> Is is the driving, pounding soundtrack to the information
> age.
"Cheap, disposable, recycleable music" is exactly what we've had since
who knows when. Many bands start making more complex or even just better
music just before they begin losing the skills they've just acquired, or
when their 15 min. of fame is almost up. Transhumanism/the information
age should correct that, not perpetuate it. IMHO, as always.
> Passionate and dispassionate, pretty and sterile, virtual and
> virtuoso. Everything that technology promises to be.
Hrmm, I'll agree to an extent. I don't see computers as pure number-
sifting machines who's only purpose is to let us become more lazy
(though, not implying that you necessarily do, either). Perhaps since
I'll always be a game programmer (and a fantasy writer) :P at heart,
I cannot see such awesome machines in anything except the most 'creative'
light. I consider this less the information age, and more the creation
age, at least after it gets going a bit. The world still has a lot to
learn before we can can concentrate on leaving all the mundane number-
crunching office jobs behind and head towards invention, insight, and,
uh, innnnnterstellar transport, that'll work. :)
So, I suppose it's just those two middle adjectives there that get to
me. <shrugs>
> Slapping soulful
> house lyrics on top of clinically accurate beats is like slapping XML on
> top of HTML. Having eerie spacey synth pads play over distorted
> energetic breakbeats is like a cold ATM in a local fruit market. The
Alright, this is a little more like what I'm talking about.
> replacement of jazz for acid jazz, roomfuls of violinists for a sampler,
> a conducter, orchestrator and composer for MIDI, virtual concerts via
> the internet instead of huge concert halls all represtent the
> digitizing, 'uploading' if you will of our common cultural aesthetic.
I don't know about this though. I mean, aren't we trying to get computers
up to our level so that we may surpass, not bring ourselves down to the
level of the machine to be left with straight computation?
I love the feel of being around hundred or thousands of others at a
concert hall. Whether it be Bach or Ozzy, the music is very moving,
and the combined energy of the crowd accentuates that. Just because
you are extropian, doesn't mean you can't use the help of others to
advance yourself.
On another note, the actual playing of an instrument can easily be much
more expressive than even the most advance sampling or MIDI. That's why
such technologies are still so obvious when heard in music. All the types
of sounds that can be produced by a violin or a guitar are uncountable,
if not infinite. Many things are not even planned. The way you pick
or bow a string can make an amazing difference in sound quality. This
is especially noticeable with recorded music. The same symphony can be
recorded with the same timing, the same positing, and even the same
instruments, but each's player's particular style of holding strings,
or blowing on brass, or if one accidentally bends strings when they hold
them, or the direction they point their instrument while playing, all
make a difference in a work. It may not be noticeable to one not listening
intently, or even if only one person is playing, but when the whole group
has these minute differences, that is what separates performances.
I have many times played famous songs on the same guitar and amp setups
that the original was played on, and though I hit it note for note, none
has ever sounded *just* like the original. I am more familiar with
the guitar, so I will stay here for a second. The amount of the string
you are bending down with your finger makes a difference, if you bend
the neck, it makes a difference, if you pick the string parallel or on
an angle, it makes a difference. Many things, like how you pull a finger
off a fret, that are not even thought about, make the largest difference.
Until MIDI can adjust realistically to all these variables, it still remains
"Cheap, disposable, recycleable music." Even when it will take these into
account, only computers themselves will be sophisticated enough to control
all these variables. So, then, it will truly be ‘uploaded,' but it should still
be anything but ‘Cheap, disposable, and recycleable.' If I could plan out
all the little inaccuracies and unintentional extras, I would be in my creative
glory. If ever such power were given to a machine, it would be a shame to
limit it to it's current standards of creativity. I would love to hear the kind
of music a computer working off of an uploaded consciousness would make,
though.
Now that would be true ‘techno'
Dave Bradley
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:17 MST