From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@netkonnect.net)
Date: Sat May 30 1998 - 12:08:09 MDT
At 02:30 AM 5/30/98 -0700, Hara RA wrote:
>> IAN: That there is a conspiracy to conceal
>> witness accounts, the satellite data, radar
>> data, 1/3 of the plane, and more is real.
>
>How can it be? Doesn't Conspiracy = ~Conspiracy?
IAN: BoInG! But but... now wait a minute there. :)
But seriously: Yes, in that we can meaningfully
denote a given subset of things as "a conspiracy"
if, and only if, we can denote another set of
things that are "not a conspiracy." We would
properly state this: C <=> -C, and if C did
not imply -C, C could not be implied. As
such, this symmetrical implication
defines a logical union.
C = (-C => C) C is its implication by -C.
-C = (C => -C) -C is its implication by C.
The holistic point (so to say) is that the
identity structure of C contains both C and -C.
**************************************************************
VISIT IAN WILLIAMS GODDARD --------> http://Ian.Goddard.net
______________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:08 MST