Re: Bogus Barney

From: Harvey Newstrom (harv@gate.net)
Date: Tue May 26 1998 - 17:55:37 MDT


EvMick wrote:
>
> It's not "leading" anywhere.

So far, so good...

> I'm just wondering about the supposed gigantic size of prehistoric critters.

Oops! Why "supposed" gigantic size? You keep saying that you're not
leading this thread anywhere, but then you also keep slipping in clues
that you really don't believe in dinosaurs. You seem to already have
decided that dinosaurs never really existed.

- "Bogus" Barney
- Dinosaur "Hypothosis"
- Dinosaur "Theory"
- fossils aren't bones
- "Is T-Rex possible...?"
- "If not...then what are fossils?"
- etc.

--
Harvey Newstrom  <mailto:harv@gate.net>  <http://www.gate.net/~harv>
PGP 5.5 Fingerprint:  F746 7A20 EB7D 27BA 80A5  4473 D8E1 6A54 1EB0 56F7
PGP Public Key available from <ldap://certserver.pgp.com>


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:08 MST