From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@netkonnect.net)
Date: Wed May 13 1998 - 09:42:34 MDT
Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com) wrote:
>>I don't see the point, it wouldn't prove they are real fossils. We
>>could likely make an unicorn today (some creative surgery or even
>>genetic hybridization with a horned species) but it wouldn't prove
>>there are unicorns.
>>Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
>
>About a decade ago, there was someone with a mutant goat which had
>a fused horn, and it was touted around neopagan and SCA circles as
>being a Unicorn....
IAN: That's almost as goofy as people who claim
that A is A free from not-A; of course, in the
fused-horn-goat case, there was at least a
single example of their case (fake as it
may have been), yet the atomists have
neither a real nor a fake unicorn.
No, my mistake, the atomists have come up
with several fake cases, like Anton's cat
that was a cat free from the black void
around it defining it as a cat, bOiNg!
Wow, now that was one phoney unicorn!
********************************************************
Visit Ian W Goddard ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________
Statements T r u t h A defines -A
a -A defines A
A: x is A b A -A
l T F A set is defined
-A: x is -A e F T by its members, thus
? ? A & -A contain each other.
--------------------------------------------------------
H O L I S M ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:05 MST