From: Hal Finney (hal@rain.org)
Date: Fri May 08 1998 - 08:28:27 MDT
Damien Broderick, <damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, writes:
> The difficulty with the most detailed natural psi experiments such as Lotto
> is, as I mentioned, that the owners of the data are usually unwilling to
> disgorge it more than once. But my work so far has set severe upper limits
> on any population incidence of psi (which might, of course, turn out to be
> zilch).
Are your results consistent with the research you mentioned recently
which aggregated data from multiple studies? Presumably they found some
incidence of successful information transfer. Was your sample set large
enough that you can would have seen an effect if that same level of psi
were present in your lottery participants?
Hal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:04 MST