X < 12 or Hara Ra = Confused

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@netkonnect.net)
Date: Thu May 07 1998 - 16:10:29 MDT


Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com) wrote:
>Ian is kind of like a flea - keeps on hopping around the same
>fallacies over and over. ...He is, to me, ironically, just the
>kind of psychoceramic indicated in the subject line.

Lee Daniel Crocker (lcrocker@mercury.colossus.net) wrote:

>> IAN: A definition is useful IF it puts
>> the defined in context, IF it defines
>> the relations of the defined to things
>> that are different than it. The "A=A"
>> definition of A does not do that...

> I have an even stronger standard: that the identity
> of an can be expressed as the relationship between
> X and not-X is a truism that a 12-year-old could
> understand with a bit of reflection...

  IAN: Or, in other words, identity holism is
  something that anyone who was under 12-years-
  old or who was Hara Ra could NOT understand,
  even after having several years to reflect!

  I realize that, like the fallacy of free energy,
  the fallacy of free identity stems from a limited
  comprehension of the phenomena under investiga-
  tion. The idea that energy is spontaneously
  created out of nothing expresses a failure
  to perceived that any energy in subset X
  came from some other subset in not-X.
 
  In the same way, any identity attribute
  of subset X did not come from subset X
  but from some other subset in not-X.
  With the identity matrix we can see
  how elementry this principle is:

                1 2 3
               _________
            1 | 0 1 2 |
              | |
            2 |-1 0 1 |
              | |
            3 |-2 -1 0 |
              -----------

  The column below each entity along the
  top lists the identity attributes of that
  entity relative to the other entities. Note
  how each entity gains 0 identity from itself.
  All attributes of X are derived from not-X.
  Identity, just like energy, is conserved.

********************************************************
Visit Ian W Goddard ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________
Statements T r u t h A defines -A
                a -A defines A
 A: x is A b A -A
                l T F A set is defined
-A: x is -A e F T by its members, thus
                    ? ? A & -A contain each other.
--------------------------------------------------------
H O L I S M ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________

 



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:04 MST