From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Wed May 06 1998 - 01:31:07 MDT
Ian Goddard <igoddard@erols.com> wrote:
>>... "true" is not an absolute and it's important to be careful
>>of how you use terms such as "true" and "false" because they are
>>presumed an absolute by both religious groups and some scientists.
>
>
> IAN: If there is no absolute truth, then that
> is an absolute truth, therefore there is an
> absolute truth. Therefore, the claim that
> there is no absolute truth must be false.
IAN: I was wondering if anyone would notice this,
since not, I'll note it: notice that there is one
answer that satisfies both opposite claims:
(1) There is no absolute truth.
(2) There is an absolute truth.
Answer: The absolute truth is zero. Then there
is both an absolute truth and no absolute truth.
Whole Truth http://www.erols.com/igoddard/truth.htm
********************************************************
Visit Ian W Goddard ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________
Statements T r u t h A defines -A
a -A defines A
A: x is A b A -A
l T F A set is defined
-A: x is -A e F T by its members, thus
? ? A & -A contain each other.
--------------------------------------------------------
H O L I S M ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:03 MST