META: policy change (was Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!)

From: David McFadzean (david@kumo.com)
Date: Mon May 04 1998 - 10:03:05 MDT

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Objectivism and Extropianism"
Previous message: Jesse Davis: "PLEASE READ! Re: E-NEWS: drug survey"
In reply to: ChuckKuecker: "Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!"
Next in thread: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: META: policy change (was Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!)"
Reply: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: META: policy change (was Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!)"
Maybe reply: ChuckKuecker: "Re: META: policy change (was Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 10:18 AM 5/4/98 -0500, ChuckKuecker wrote:

>Is this lis supported by get rich schemes??

No, but currently we allow anyone to post a message to the list.

I would like to suggest that we change the policy so that only
subscribers to the list may post messages. Any list members with
multiple e-mail addresses may register their aliases by sending
me e-mail.

Any objections?

--
David McFadzean                 david@kumo.com
Memetic Engineer                http://www.kumo.com/~david/
Kumo Software Corp.             http://www.kumo.com

Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Objectivism and Extropianism"
Previous message: Jesse Davis: "PLEASE READ! Re: E-NEWS: drug survey"
In reply to: ChuckKuecker: "Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!"
Next in thread: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: META: policy change (was Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!)"
Reply: Harvey Newstrom: "Re: META: policy change (was Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!)"
Maybe reply: ChuckKuecker: "Re: META: policy change (was Re: THIS ONE IS WORTH READING!)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:02 MST