Science vs Truth ?

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Thu Apr 30 1998 - 10:55:31 MDT


At 10:33 PM 4/29/98 -0400, Ian Goddard wrote:

 Some points of clarification:

>> What is true or false knowledge?
>
>
> IAN: A lie constitutes false knowledge.
> A true statement (i.e., a statement that
> maximizes a 100% accurate representation
> of the physical universe or mathematic
> models) constitutes true knowledge.
>
> Of course a true statement A, is A relative
> to not-A, hence the false defines the true.
> If all statements were true, they'd just
> be statements (if in U, A = 100% and not-A
> = 0%, A = 0%).

     IAN: Here the "A" is applied to the
     attribute of statements, which is the
     attribute "true," and is not applied
     here to statements per se. That attri-
     bute is defined by its not, which is
     "false," just as statements are de-
     fined by their not, not-statements.

>
> In short: A, if and only if not-A.

   IAN: This means that in U (universal set),
   A exists if and only if not-A exists. Now,
   one might posit a contradiction by saying
   "Well, if not not-A (if not-A is absent)
   then A, since not not-A = A." Yes, that
   is logical, however, "not" properly de-
   notes the "complement of" and not the
   "absence of." The absence of is properly
   denoted by "zero" or "null." So to express
   the absence of not-A we'd say, "If not-A
   is null, then A is null."

   People often counter: if A is only if not-A,
   then what about the whole unvierse, where's
   the not-universe? There is no not-universe,
   that this is why the whole universe = 0,
   expressed by the conservation of identity,
   which follows directly from the conservation
   of difference, since identity is difference:

                    1 2 3 ...
                   _________
                1 | 0 1 2 |
                  | |
                2 |-1 0 1 |
                  | |
                3 |-2 -1 0 |
                  -----------

    Just as the difference between 3 and 3 is
    0, the difference between All and All is
    0, expressed in the zero sum of the whole
    differential matrix. All things, every unit
    of measure, be it one, an inch, a minute,
    a Newton, a Pascal, an ohm, and so forth
    are the products of differential relation,
    and as such no unit can exceed the simple
    analysis presented in the identity matrix.
    The only identity attributes are derived
    from the relations of different subsets.

    Everything is a subset of identity, and
    since identity is derived from difference,
    and since difference is conserved, All = 0,
    which follows directly from the fact that
    there is no not-Universe, thus U = null.

****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________

REV. ROGER WILLIAMS ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/roger.htm
________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:49:01 MST