Re: Why Atheism Beats Agnosticism

From: T0Morrow (T0Morrow@aol.com)
Date: Mon Apr 27 1998 - 15:14:31 MDT


Said I:

>> Like Laplace, I have little need for the god hypothesis.
>> But the atheistic certainty in god's non-existence strikes
>> me as a bit too cock-sure.

Responded otter@globalxs.nl (den Otter):

> Being sure of your case (or at least pretending to be sure) has a memetic
> advantage, and if you're wrong and there *is* a "god", so what? Nothing
> would matter anyway.

Whether or not a claim has a "memetic advantage" hardly settles the issue of
what claims to make. Back when people spoke of "rhetoric" rather than
"memetics" (a fine distinction, I suppose, but one must stay au courant the
buzzwords), they widely recognized that persuasion should stop short of
falsehood.

Tom



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:59 MST