From: ChuckKuecker (ckuecker@mcs.net)
Date: Thu Apr 16 1998 - 12:53:38 MDT
At 23:03 4/15/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>I respectfully disagree. Especially when you consider a population, the
>probability of an unnatural death does NOT increase. If the population
>decided to take more airplane rides than normal per year per person, then
>the frequency of accidents would increase as a function of the number of
>flights. If, on the other hand, the overall level of risk-aversive behavior
>reamins the same, the frequency of accidents will not increase as a function
>of time. Look, the simple way of saying this is that if you live twice as
>long, you'll have twice as many accidents. That's not the same thing as
>saying the accident "frequency" increases. If something happens once/year
>and you're around one year, then odds are you will see it happen once. If
>you're around two years you'll see it happen twice. The frequency hasn't
>changed. Is that clearer?
>
Statistics was not my strong point in school. I see the difference between
'frequency' and 'quantity' now..frequency is 'how often', and has no bearing
on 'how many'..
Thanks for the pointer.
Chuck Kuecker
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:55 MST