Re: The Colonization of Cypherspace

From: ChuckKuecker (ckuecker@mcs.net)
Date: Mon Apr 13 1998 - 07:14:36 MDT


At 00:52 4/13/98 PDT, you wrote:
>
>Imagine we could change the laws of physics, so that we could make a
>material with the following properties: cheap as concrete, and tough
>enough to withstand the blast of a supernova. Out of this we could make
>walls, safes, locks, armor light enough to coat vehicles
>and wear as clothes, envelopes impervious to snooping or
>tampering, and a wide variety of other devices to defeat violence
>against individuals and their property. The security possible for
>individuals in our current physical world would be put to shame.
>
>I know of a frontier where these kinds of materials are available.
>Specifically, one-way functions, trapdoor one-way functions, and the
>other building blocks of cypherspace. Offensive computations could
>quite literally consume the energies of supernovae, and still not crack
>codes generated by a lowly Intel chip. These codes are currently
>available. In the future with quantum cryptography, security against
>computers and quantum computers of even infinite energies is possible.
>
>Out of these ultratough materials of cypherspace, we can really
>build a Galt's Gulch: heretofore merely a metaphorical
>ideal or a hopeless dream about physical security.
>
<snip>
>
>James Hart
>

Just an aside for US readers: there is an effort in Congress to restrict
encryption, again - see

http://www.crypto.com/adopt/

This provides news on encryption regulations and information on how to
contact seators and 'representatives' to voice your veiws on said legislation..

Chuck Kuecker, President
C K Enterprises, Inc.
326 Deveron Circle
Cary, Il 60013
USA
(847) 639-2771
(847) 516-1410 FAX
ckuecker@mcs.net
www.mcs.net/~ckuecker/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:54 MST