Re: USA RULES OK!!!!

From: Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com)
Date: Tue Mar 17 1998 - 23:35:38 MST


> Anton Sherwood wrote:
> > [...] the USA did not take advantage of WW2 to pursue
> > territorial expansion; that may be because the courts might make the
> > government treat its new subjects like citizens -- much more convenient
> > to occupy them as "military advisors" and/or rule through puppets.

Dwayne wrote:
> Even more convenient to do away with the overheads of occupation
> and rule and extract just as much money from unfair trade as you
> could have via tribute.

And what is "unfair trade"?

> I think this is by far the cleverest thing the US has done:
> instead of maintaining huge standing armies and colonial
> administration, with the associated costs, simply ensure that
> your domestic companies are the dominant players in the market
> and suck money out that way. bingo, all the benefits of an empire
> and none of the disadvantages.

And how do you pick winners in the marketplace, without governing it?

-- 
"How'd ya like to climb this high without no mountain?" --Porky Pine
Anton Sherwood   *\\*   +1 415 267 0685
!! visiting New Mexico, end of March !!


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:46 MST