From: Prof. Gomes (profgomes@geocities.com)
Date: Mon Mar 16 1998 - 18:17:05 MST
At 22:33 15/03/98 -0700, you wrote:
>> >Ian Goddard wrote:
>> >> As I've shown many times, the definition of identity
>> >> "A=A" is the crackpot fallacy of Circular Definition:
>
>> Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com) wrote:
>> >I don't see the word "identity" in the phrase "A=A", do you?
>
>Ian Goddard wrote:
>> IAN: "A" is the identity. [...]
>
>No, identity is the *relation* between A and itself.
>If "A" were the identity, then all things which are equal to themselves
>would be equal to each other. Is that why you preach that A = the
>universe?
>
>If a definition is fallacious for including a paraphrase of the word
>defined, then *all* definitions are fallacious. And yet they're still
>useful.
>
>--
>"How'd ya like to climb this high without no mountain?" --Porky Pine
>Anton Sherwood *\\* +1 415 267 0685
>
>
>
Respectfully to Mr IAN: You could read something in "Mathematical
Philosophy", like Bertrand Russel or other...
Sin,
Gomes.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:45 MST