From: Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com)
Date: Wed Mar 11 1998 - 21:41:17 MST
mark@unicorn.com wrote:
> We can infer that "other persons" is a generic term and doesn't apply
> exclusively to slaves (it clearly, for example, includes Indians who
> aren't taxed). If they meant 'only count slaves as 3/5 of a person,
> but count everyone else' they would have said so. Slaves are clearly
> counted as "other people", but so, for example, are untaxed Indians.
Nope. "Indians not taxed" are excluded, not counted at all.
-- "How'd ya like to climb this high without no mountain?" --Porky Pine Anton Sherwood *\\* +1 415 267 0685 !! visiting New Mexico, end of March !!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:44 MST