Re: junk DNA

From: CALYK (CALYK@aol.com)
Date: Tue Mar 03 1998 - 21:07:29 MST


In a message dated 98-03-03 23:05:01 EST, you write:

<< This is a bit disingenuous. Current hypotheses of junk DNA origin hold
 that it comes from meiotic recombination errors and transposons, and
 possibly other similar things. Given that origin, it will tend to
 have a complex fractal structure characteristic of many information-
 containing processes. In a sense it *is* meaningful, because it
 records DNA duplication "errors" and thus can be a tool for analyzing
 evolution. But it's not communication, just a record
 of a fractal process. Certainly "language" is a lousy metaphor for this
 process.
>>

Do other animals have junk DNA?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:41 MST