What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]

From: Daniel Gilliland (dang@whc.net)
Date: Wed Feb 25 1998 - 19:14:19 MST

• Next message: Anton Sherwood: "clones"
• Previous message: den Otter: "Re: PHIL: Extropy, Boundaries and Suicide"
• In reply to: DOUG.BAILEY@EY.COM: "Re: Credibility of SciAm"
• Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
• Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

         Can someone briefly explain what was so upsetting about the
nanotech article? ... didn't see it, myself.

-dan

• Next message: Anton Sherwood: "clones"
• Previous message: den Otter: "Re: PHIL: Extropy, Boundaries and Suicide"
• In reply to: DOUG.BAILEY@EY.COM: "Re: Credibility of SciAm"
• Next in thread: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
• Reply: Anders Sandberg: "Re: What about the nanotech? [Credibility of SciAm]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:39 MST