From: Anton Sherwood (dasher@netcom.com)
Date: Mon Feb 02 1998 - 20:39:21 MST
: > ... This means that a defendant can deny that he committed the
: > crime, and then claim that the reason he committed it was because he
: > was entrapped.
Craig Presson observes:
: The law is full of strange loops like this, but this one can also be
: unravelled less strangely (and less entertainingly): "My client denies
: participating in the act in question, but even if the actual
: perpetrator were here on trial, the prosecution's case is tainted by
: entrapment."
Alternatively, "My client was entrapped into what s/he did -- which,
by the way, did not fulfill all the necessary elements of the charge."
Anton Sherwood *\\* +1 415 267 0685 *\\* DASher@netcom.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:33 MST