From: Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin (warrl@mail.blarg.net)
Date: Sun Jan 18 1998 - 09:49:41 MST
> From: Damien Broderick <damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
> At 05:05 PM 1/18/98 +0000, Nick Bostrom wrote:
>
> >if d is big enough, then by the time the probes have traveled 10% of
> >the way, the remaining 90% will have grown larger than the original
> >100%, due to the expansion of space inbetween. So if that expansion
> >rate settles down to a constant, then there must be a sphere centered
> >around Earth such that nothing that is outside of that sphere can
> >*ever* affect Earth, even if it travels with the speed of light.
>
> I believe you have just reinvented the canonical explanation for Olbers'
> Paradox.
We can also use this to set bounds on the expansion rate. The
diameter of the sphere is set by the expansion rate, and we can (by
definition) observe the edges of the observable universe, but nothing
beyond those edges.
What's the current estimate of the diameter of the observable
universe?
US$500 fee for receipt of unsolicited commercial email. USC 47.5.II.227
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:29 MST