From: Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin (warrl@mail.blarg.net)
Date: Sun Jan 18 1998 - 09:16:45 MST
> On Fri, 16 Jan 1998, CurtAdams wrote:
> > [...]
> > Yes, but my point, in some post, was that whole-body levels of
> > telomerase are probably already close to optimal. If the gains
> > from increasing telomerase exceeded the risks, evolution would
> > already have cranked it up. In order to get big gains from
What is the definition of "optimal" and who/what produced this
definition? Is this definition still acceptable?
US$500 fee for receipt of unsolicited commercial email. USC 47.5.II.227
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:29 MST