Re: Semi-Automated Programming

From: Peter C. McCluskey (pcm@rahul.net)
Date: Sat Jan 17 1998 - 20:03:21 MST


 eugene@liposome.genebee.msu.su (Eugene Leitl) writes:
>I think what cripples current system is that the GA/GP system's metalevel
>(obviously only the fitness function should be sacred, orelse we float off
>into Never-Never land) is not open to GA optimization, which makes the
>resulting system limited, and brittle. A good GP must adjust at least the
>mutation rate and the coding to guarantee a certain kind of optimal

 I see no sign that these are significant impediments to the usefullness
of GA/GP's. CPU time appears to be the biggest problem. Last I heard, Koza
had a 64 processor system, and was waiting hours if not days for a typical
run to finish.
 And of course, translating abstract problems into fitness functions
is not a trivial programming task.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter McCluskey          | caffeine   O   CH3
pcm@rahul.net            |            ||  |
http://www.rahul.net/pcm |      H3C   C   N
                         |         \ / \ / \
                         |          N   C   C
                                    |   ||  ||
                                    C   C---N
                                  // \ /
                                  O   N
                                      |
                                      CH3


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:28 MST