From: CurtAdams (CurtAdams@aol.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 1998 - 12:00:00 MST
Damien Broderick <damien@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au> writes:
>
> >Could it be that telomerase is harmful in some tissues?
>
> My guess is that its production is inactivated in somatic cells as a
> general prophylaxis against cancer. Immortal tumors do, indeed, switch
> telomerase production back on. If we wish to extend our lives by tweaking
> this mechanism, we're going to have to be *very careful*...
My preferred method would be to introduce the telomerase in a method
such that the cell does not have control over its existence. For
example, add in a short artificial chromosome to the cells containing
the telomerase gene but a different kind of telomere which the telomerase
can't affect. Set up the artificial chromosome so that after a
specified number of divisions the shortening of its telomeres either
aborts its replication or, better, inactivates the telomerase.
That way you could protect the cells from senescence for a limited time
but after the desired number of replications the cell loses the telomerase
and returns to the normal replicative control and normal cancer risk.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:28 MST