From: Twink (neptune@mars.superlink.net)
Date: Thu Jan 01 1998 - 19:19:00 MST
At 01:55 PM 1/1/98 -0800, Hara Ra <harara@shamanics.com> wrote:
>> Smash the state, sure, but then what? While
>> privatizing and pluralizing functions presently performed (mostly
>> brutally, always badly) by monolithic governments will definitely
>> eliminate the State, nothing will eliminate government.
>
>There are perhaps some functions that governments do now which may still
>be best done by a government. I am not well read enough on privatization
>to really argue this. There may be some global regulatory and military
>functions which suit a governmental model. Others on this list are
>invited to comment.
Some functions of government, such as persecuting people for victimless
crimes, should not be done at all.
Other functions can be privatized, as others have noted. I see no limits on
this process. Every legitimate government function was at one time done
privately.
For those interested in further reading on this matter, I suggest the following:
_The Enterprise of Law: Justice Without the State_ by Bruce L. Benson
_For a New Liberty_ by Murray N. Rothbard
_The Machinery of Freedom_ by David Friedman
_Welfare Economics and Externalities in an Open Ended Universe_ by
Roy Cordato
I don't agree with all that is written in these works and they come from a
variety of viewpoints. Benson applies public choice economics to the
realm of law. Rothbard is a hardline Lockean rights advocate. Friedman
is staunchly anti-rights. Cordato argues from Austrian economics to why
there is no need, in principle, for a government.
However, despite their disagreements and differences in approach, they
all provide much food for thought. The historical examples present in
the first three also bolster their theoretical arguments.
Daniel Ust
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:48:22 MST