From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Tue Dec 16 1997 - 07:32:08 MST
Twink <neptune@mars.superlink.net> writes:
> Protein: Anders mentioned some proteins denature. I'm not
> sure if this is because of low temperatures, interaction with cps or
> some other process(es).
I got this from Mike Darwin. Obviously some cps do it, but it seems to
be a temperature phenomenon too.
> Other:
> Note tolerance level to cp.
> Does it cause any damage?
> More than one cp?
> Is a cp "cocktail" better than one cp?
The problem is the combinatoric explosion of the search space.
> Perhaps different cps should be used for different
> tissues?
Problem: how do you get them there?
> Perhaps different cps should be used at at different
> times in the process?
Sounds like a good idea.
> What is its long term optimal working temperature?
Irrelevant, since its only purpose is to limit tissue damage doing
suspension. Of course, if it caused continuing damage at -170, then it
would be a concern, but that is rather unlikely.
> Design of "home" cryonics kit for use in emergency situations.
> (This involves messy legal issues, but the design of
> one might lead to a wider acceptance of cryonics by
> making it a fait accompli.)
A fun idea. I can see before me "The Little Cryonicist" for kids:
suspend your pet (liquid nitrogen not included). Not very likely to
work, though, since it likely requires medical expertise.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:13 MST