Re: Open vs. Closed Universe(s) was Mega-mega engineering?

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Sun Nov 30 1997 - 05:38:45 MST


"Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin" <warrl@blarg.net> writes:

> The requirements for one method of opening a closed universe -- or
> closing an open one -- are known, at least roughly.
>
> All we need is the ability to shift very large masses of matter
> arbitrarily through time.

Nice. And of course we can solve overpopulation and the Halting
Problem the same way...

> Of course, the engineering problems in this proposal are somewhat
> daunting. :-)

Yes. They are always the hard part when solving problems with
imaginary technology :-) That is why I really admire Dyson for
actually calculating how to move stars and galactic masses using known
physics, instead of imaginary physics. I think we need more of that on
this list.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:10 MST