Only Ad Hominem Appropriate ?

From: Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Date: Wed Nov 26 1997 - 15:32:22 MST


Hara Ra (harara@shamanics.com) wrote:
>
>Jerome wrote:
>>
>> Ian Goddard has not been "ranting", IMHO.
>>
>> All he as done is ask that those who would know the truth, examine the
>> facts.
>I am under the belief that this mailing list is about Extropian topics
>and I totally fail to see what TWA800 has to do with Extropian ideas.

  IAN: So, since you defined Abraham's TWA 800 arguments,
  which were 100% ad hominem, as "truly meaningful," and
  thanked him for posting them, and yet found my arguments,
  100% facts, as "ranting" inappropriate for the list, it
  follows that only ad hominem as appropriate for the list.

  I quite disagree.

****************************************************************
VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:10 MST