From: Abraham Moses Genen (futurist@frontiernet.net)
Date: Wed Nov 19 1997 - 17:17:46 MST
Abraham Moses Genen
**************************************************************
Being dedicated to the future progress of humankind
should be the prime concern of all civilized beings.
**************************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Goddard <igoddard@erols.com>
To: extropians@extropy.org <extropians@extropy.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 19, 1997 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: NY Times Lies Re: Goddard
>>Abraham Moses Genen (futurist@frontiernet.net)
>>Dear Fellow Extropians:
>>
>>Having read Mr. Goddard's speculations, conjectures ( and possibly
>>paranoid delusions)repeatedly, may I respectfully suggest that he
>>consider reading Aristotle on scientific method followed by
>>Blackstone on the rules of evidence.
>
Since Mr. Goddard claims to have all this "proof" let him supply us with the substantive and corroborated unimpeachable documentation and physical evidence. I'm not really interested in so-called "eye witnesses" whose imaginations can easily play tricks on them.
Any first year law student knows that "eye witnesses" are rarely consistant or reliable.
On the other hand, in the absence of such legitimately meaningful evidence and continued specious and uncorroborated claims, psychotherapy from a competent licensed clinician might be in order. It seems that this possible fixation may have gone to far.
AMG
> IAN: (1) There is proof that the military
> lied about their activities on July 17,'96.
> (2) There is proof the govt continues to lie
> about such. (3) There is proof that the FBI
> has acted to cover up facts. (4) There is
> photographic evidence of a military drone-
> type aerial device a few miles and moments
> from the crash. (5) There are over 100 wit-
> nesses of a missile-like streak rising from
> the ocean to impact TWA 800. (6) There is
> massive penetration deformation to the
> exterior fuselage panels exceeding the
> psi strength of a CFT explosion.
>
> Proof of deception, physical evidence of
> external-projectile penetration, photo-
> graphic evidence of military activity,
> over 100 harmonious eyewitness accounts
> of projectile penetration... sorry to
> foil your ad hominem, but that's not
> a "paranoid delusion."
>
> Now you may be more impressed by claims
> of government officials that "We didn't
> do it," than you are with proofs and
> overwhelming evidence, but I am not.
>
> The propensity for so many to be duped
> by incredulous government claims... for
> so many to fail to question the dictates
> of authorities and define all that does
> as "paranoid" is a sorry sight. Such is
> what it takes to loose all freedoms.
>
>
>****************************************************************
>VISIT Ian Williams Goddard ----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
>________________________________________________________________
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 14:45:08 MST